Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:48:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unreproducible report, no feedback from bug submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2004 22:17:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 06 16:17:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.9] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AdyTh-0001aq-00; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:11:05 -0600
Received: (qmail 93628 invoked by uid 88); 6 Jan 2004 21:11:04 -0000
Received: from pd9e961b4.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO ?192.168.123.111?) 
(217.233.97.180)
  by mail.bytecamp.net with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 21:11:04 -0000
Subject: gcc returns "... might be used uninitialized in this function"
        where it shouldn't
From: Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5 
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:03:27 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
        2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 3.2.3-9
Severity: minor
Tags: sid

Unfortunately I wasn't able to track down this issue.
The code snippet in question is from the nautilus package:

=== beginning ===
static gboolean
select_range (NautilusIconContainer *container,
              NautilusIcon *icon1,
              NautilusIcon *icon2)
{
        gboolean selection_changed;
        GList *p;
        NautilusIcon *icon;
        NautilusIcon *unmatched_icon;
        gboolean select;
                                                                                
        selection_changed = FALSE;
                                                                                
        unmatched_icon = NULL;
        select = FALSE;
        for (p = container->details->icons; p != NULL; p = p->next) {
                icon = p->data;
                                                                                
                if (unmatched_icon == NULL) {
                        if (icon == icon1) {
                                unmatched_icon = icon2;
                                select = TRUE;
                        } else if (icon == icon2) {
                                unmatched_icon = icon1;
                                select = TRUE;
                        }
                }
                                                                                
                selection_changed |= icon_set_selected
                        (container, icon, select);
                                                                                
                if (unmatched_icon != NULL && icon == unmatched_icon) {
                        select = FALSE;
                }
                                                                                
        }
=== (...) snap ===
}
=== end ===

gcc returns:
nautilus-icon-container.c: In function `handle_icon_button_press':
nautilus-icon-container.c:1768: warning: `selection_changed' might be used 
uninitialized in this function

obviously it actually IS always initialized

the whole file can be found under:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?S40724BF6

Do you need any additional information?

regs,
 Chris


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 226459-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2004 10:52:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 03:52:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BEnQf-0003c0-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 03:52:10 -0700
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16136
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:48:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3HAmKZk025348;
        Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:48:20 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:48:20 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unreproducible report, no feedback from bug submitter
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

unreproducible report, no feedback from bug submitter, closing the
report.


Reply via email to