On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Matthias Klose wrote: > Matthew Wilcox writes: > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:08:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > hppa is the only platform with gcc-3.0/g++-3.0. Is this version still > > > needed for hppa builds, or can it be removed? On all other platforms, > > > we just build the libstdc++ runtime library (but doesn't seem to be > > > needed, I haven't seen third party software referencing this libstdc++ > > > library version). > > > > Do we now have no packages that Build-Depend on gcc-3.0 or g++-3.0? > > There seem to be an extraordinarily large number of packages in testing > > for hppa that are still linked against libstdc++3. > > maybe to be a bit clearer, remove it from unstable. then it get's > removed from testing, when no more packages reference it in testing. > > looking at the packages depending on libstdc++3, I see most > badly,maintained, outdated packages, so removing these as well is an > alternative. the current dependencies in unstable are: > > libgc6 - don't know why this is still built using 3.0. The boehm-gc > sources build fine with 3.3. just filed RC report. > > gutenbrowser - did depend on qt2, which was removed. #254307. > > x10 - needs to be rebuilt. #236060. > > playmp3list - needs to be rebuilt. #236116. > > npadmin - needs to be rebuilt. #236117. > > juice - needs to be rebuilt. #236053. > > flying - needs to be rebuilt. #236046. > > craft - needs to be rebuilt. #236043. > > cdindex-client - needs to be rebuilt. #236041. > > blackbook - needs to be rebuilt. #236040. > > bbpal - needs to be rebuilt. #236037. > > abuse-sdl - needs to be rebuilt. #221379.
Wasn't PALO (the bootloader) also build-dependant upon 3.0 at some point? -- Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/