On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:33:01PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Possible "solutions": > 1) Delay gcc-3.3's entry into sarge by making it Depend on binutils > 2.15.
For the record, I consider this to be the better idea. -- Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:33:01PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Possible "solutions": > 1) Delay gcc-3.3's entry into sarge by making it Depend on binutils > 2.15.
For the record, I consider this to be the better idea. -- Daniel Jacobowitz