On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:44:03AM -0500, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > No warning, but the generated code seems incorrect (or at least a > regression from 3.3) unless ((int *)&val)[x] isn't the correct > portable way to access a vector element, but there doesn't seem to be > an alternative that I've been able to deduce (and the documentation > doesn't list any).
It isn't correct. Use a union; you're violating the strict-aliasing rules. -- Daniel Jacobowitz
