Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:29:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0-0pre0 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2004 17:32:55 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 18 10:32:55 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bqk156.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (Knoppix) [83.29.78.156] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C8j4w-0000in-00; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:32:55 -0700 Received: by Knoppix via sendmail from stdin id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:32:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: g++-3.5 installed on debian, render g++-3.4 useless Bcc: X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.2 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:32:21 +0200 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: g++-3.5 Version: 3.5-0pre1 Severity: normal I have both g++-3.4 and g++-3.5 on this system. After installing 3.5, I am unable to compile c++ apps using 3.4 (in many cases I want not to use development version of gcc). I guess that's problem with libc++-dev. Since 3.5 is renumbered to 4.0, Wouldn't it be natural to bump version on libc++ ? (to 7). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers experimental APT policy: (990, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages g++-3.5 depends on: ii gcc-3.5 3.5-0pre1 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.5-base 3.5-0pre1 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libstdc++6-dev 3.5-0pre1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 261693-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2004 07:29:08 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 22 00:29:08 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CA1Yq-0000wn-00; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:29:08 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00700; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:29:05 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66D8F218; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:29:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 19663-45; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:29:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:29:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i8M7T430009170; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:29:04 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:29:04 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0-0pre0 to experimental In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: > gcc-4.0 (4.0-0pre0) experimental; urgency=low > . > * gcc-4.0 snapshot, taken from the HEAD branch CVS 20040912. > . > * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > - Integrate accumulated packaging patches from gcc-3.4. > - Rename libstdc++6-* packages to libstdc++6-4-* (closes: #261693). > - libffi4-dev: conflict with libffi3-dev (closes: #265939). > . > * Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > * control.m4: > - s/locale_no_archs !hurd-i386/locale_no_archs/g > (This is now handled in rules.defs. [1]) > - s/procps [check_no_archs]/procps [linux_gnu_archs]/g [2] > - Add type-handling to build-deps. [3] > * rules.conf: > - Don't require (>= $(libc_ver)) for libc0.1-dev. [4] > - Generate *_no_archs variables with type-handling and use them for > for m4's -D parameters. [3] > * rules.defs: > - use filter instead of findstring [1]. > - s/netbsd-elf-gnu/netbsdelf-gnu/g [5]. > - enable java for kfreebsd-gnu [6] > - enable ffi for kfreebsd-gnu and knetbsd-gnu [6] > - enable libgc for kfreebsd-gnu [6] > - enable checks for kfreebsd-gnu and knetbsd-gnu [7] > - enable locales for kfreebsd-gnu and gnu [1] [8]. > * Closes: #264025.