Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:56:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-4.0: Fails on static function declaration inside a function
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 15:21:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 10 07:21:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c158155.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.158.155] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Ccma4-0005tI-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:21:16 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CcmeC-0005vZ-HT; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:25:32 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: alsa-lib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 
'shm_sum_discard'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:25:32 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: alsa-lib
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'alsa-lib' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

 x86_64-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -g 
-Wall -O2 -MT pcm_dmix.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/pcm_dmix.Tpo -c pcm_dmix.c  -fPIC 
-DPIC -o .libs/pcm_dmix.o
pcm_dmix.c: In function 'shm_sum_create_or_connect':
pcm_dmix.c:61: error: invalid storage class for function 'shm_sum_discard'
make[3]: *** [pcm_dmix.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/alsa-lib-1.0.7/src/pcm'

With the attached patch 'alsa-lib' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/alsa-lib-1.0.7/src/conf.c ./src/conf.c
--- ../tmp-orig/alsa-lib-1.0.7/src/conf.c       2004-10-05 17:33:04.000000000 
+0200
+++ ./src/conf.c        2004-12-10 16:06:16.644746376 +0100
@@ -2486,6 +2486,8 @@
                                snd_config_searcha, snd_config_searchva);
 }
 
+static int snd_config_hooks(snd_config_t *config, snd_config_t *private_data);
+
 /**
  * \brief Searches for a node in a configuration tree and expands hooks.
  * \param config Handle to the root of the configuration (sub)tree to search.
@@ -2496,7 +2498,6 @@
  */
 int snd_config_search_hooks(snd_config_t *config, const char *key, 
snd_config_t **result)
 {
-       static int snd_config_hooks(snd_config_t *config, snd_config_t 
*private_data);
        SND_CONFIG_SEARCH(config, key, result, \
                                        err = snd_config_hooks(config, NULL); \
                                        if (err < 0) \
@@ -2504,6 +2505,8 @@
                         );
 }
 
+static int snd_config_hooks(snd_config_t *config, snd_config_t *private_data);
+
 /**
  * \brief Searches for a node in a configuration tree, expanding aliases and 
hooks.
  * \param root Handle to the root configuration node containing alias
@@ -2516,7 +2519,6 @@
  */
 int snd_config_searcha_hooks(snd_config_t *root, snd_config_t *config, const 
char *key, snd_config_t **result)
 {
-       static int snd_config_hooks(snd_config_t *config, snd_config_t 
*private_data);
        SND_CONFIG_SEARCHA(root, config, key, result,
                                        snd_config_searcha_hooks,
                                        err = snd_config_hooks(config, NULL); \
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/alsa-lib-1.0.7/src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c ./src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c
--- ../tmp-orig/alsa-lib-1.0.7/src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c       2004-10-29 
12:56:22.000000000 +0200
+++ ./src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c        2004-12-10 16:03:48.061334488 +0100
@@ -53,12 +53,13 @@
  *
  */
 
+static int shm_sum_discard(snd_pcm_direct_t *dmix);
+
 /*
  *  sum ring buffer shared memory area 
  */
 static int shm_sum_create_or_connect(snd_pcm_direct_t *dmix)
 {
-       static int shm_sum_discard(snd_pcm_direct_t *dmix);
        struct shmid_ds buf;
        int tmpid, err;
        size_t size;

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285283-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2004 19:57:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 12 11:57:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fmmailgate05.web.de [217.72.192.243] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CdZqI-0003QG-00; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 11:57:18 -0800
Received: by fmmailgate05.web.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/webde Linux 0.7) with SMTP id 
iBCJtp76024069
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:56:47 +0100
Received: from 80.144.168.24 by freemailng5701.web.de with HTTP;
        Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:56:38 +0100
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:56:38 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Falk Hueffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-4.0: Fails on static function declaration inside a function
Precedence: fm-user
X-WEBDE-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: http://freemail.web.de/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

(let's try again, the first mail seems to have been eaten.)

ISO/IEC 9899:1999, p. 30: "A function declaration can contain the
storage-class specifier 'static' only if it is at file scope[.]"

Falk



Reply via email to