Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301159: g++-3.4: gcc/g++ should use an alternative to
select the version to use
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 03:35:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 19:35:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEJ7f-0008J7-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:35:03 -0800
Received: from mutualite-2-82-67-64-132.fbx.proxad.net (localhost.localdomain)
[82.67.64.132]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEJ7e-0002A6-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:35:02 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g++-3.4: gcc/g++ should use an alternative to select the version to use
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:35:01 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: g++-3.4
Version: 3.4.3-12
Severity: wishlist
I was a bit disapointed, having gcc 3.4 and 3.3 installed, to see this
# update-alternatives --config g++
No alternatives for g++
# _
Is there a particular reason not to use it ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages g++-3.4 depends on:
ii gcc-3.4 3.4.3-12 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.4-base 3.4.3-12 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++6-dev 3.4.3-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301159-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 20:10:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 12:10:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEv8o-0005IY-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:10:46 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA22421;
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:44 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE10F217;
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:43 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 20858-19; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:42 +0100 (MET) 11239
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j2PKAg2L028869;
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:42 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:42 +0100
To: Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#301159: g++-3.4: gcc/g++ should use an alternative to select
the version to use
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Matthieu Moy writes:
> Package: g++-3.4
> Version: 3.4.3-12
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I was a bit disapointed, having gcc 3.4 and 3.3 installed, to see this
>
> # update-alternatives --config g++
> No alternatives for g++
> # _
>
> Is there a particular reason not to use it ?
yes, different ABI's and API's. Please have a look at the bug archives
for more information.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
