Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:49:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds10-0pre10 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2005 08:50:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 09 01:50:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKBfJ-0008RB-00; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 01:50:06 -0700
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454D03067C2;
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:49:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAB02C80FE;
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:49:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 02796-02; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:49:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A75C92C80DC;
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:49:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 9 Apr 2005
10:49:31 +0200
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libstdc++6-4.0-dbg: not installable in sid
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:49:31 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libstdc++6-4.0-dbg
Version: 4.0-0pre5
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get -t experimental install libstdc++6-4.0-dbg
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libstdc++6-4.0-dbg: Depends: libstdc++6-3.4-dbg but it is not installable
Depends: libstdc++6-0-dbg but it is not installable
Depends: libstdc++60-dbg but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
Are the packages missing because they are waiting for ftpadmin's
approval into the archive or are these just bogus dependencies ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages libstdc++6-4.0-dbg depends on:
ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0-0pre9 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libstdc++6 4.0-0pre9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 303866-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2005 07:49:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 12 00:49:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLG99-0006ll-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:49:19 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA08478;
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:49:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA7DF21A;
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:49:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 06472-42; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:49:10 +0200 (MEST) 11340
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:49:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j3C7n9jP016308;
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:49:09 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:49:09 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fixed in upload of gcc-4.0 4.0ds10-0pre10 to experimental
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
> Changes:
> gcc-4.0 (4.0ds10-0pre10) experimental; urgency=low
> .
> * gcc-4.0.0-20050410 release candidate 1, built from the prerelease
> tarball.
> - C++ fix for "optimizer breaks function inlining". Closes: #302989.
> * Append the GCC version to the fastjar/grepjar version string.
> * Use short file names in the libstdc++ docs (closes: #301140).
> * Fix libstdc++-dbg dependencies (closes: #303866).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
