Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 21:44:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#272401: g++-3.3: Nonstandard location for stdlibc++ header
files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2004 19:14:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 19 12:14:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pd9e778c3.dip.t-dialin.net (Knoppix) [217.231.120.195]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C978V-0006Vt-00; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:14:11 -0700
Received: by Knoppix
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:13:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Schnetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g++-3.3: Nonstandard location for stdlibc++ header files
Bcc:
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:13:40 +0200
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.2
Severity: normal
The Debian version of g++ installs the libstdc++ header files into the
directroy "/usr/include/c++/3.3". The "standard" location is the
slightly different "/usr/include/c++/3.3.4". Is there a reason for
this? This breaks e.g. Intel's C++ compiler icpc 8.1, which by
default wants to use the g++ header and library files in order to
create binary compatible code.
It is arguably Intel's task to make their compiler compatible with
g++; however, since in this case Debian seems to be different from
what a "standard" g++ install would do, I want to argue that Debian
should also use the "standard" include file location. Unless, of
course, there is agood reason for begin different.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
ii gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.2 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++5-3.3-dev 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 272401-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 19:45:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 12:45:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZZub-0006xc-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 12:45:29 -0700
Received: from [82.82.220.210] (helo=juist)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(WEB.DE 4.105 #291)
id 1DZZu6-0003Ul-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 May 2005 21:44:58 +0200
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DZZu7-0002gZ-3p
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 May 2005 21:44:59 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#272401: g++-3.3: Nonstandard location for stdlibc++ header
files
From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Face: "iUeUu$b*W_"w?tV83Y3*r:`rh&dRv}$YnZ3,LVeCZSYVuf[Gpo*5%_=/\_!gc_,SS}[~xZ
wY77I-M)xHIx:2f56g%/`SOw"Dx%4Xq0&f\Tj~>|QR|vGlU}TBYhiG(K:2<T^
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 21:44:59 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (cilantro, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
since there is a good reason for this, and this simply seems to be
sloppy coding in icc, I'll close this.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
