Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:18:56AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > >>Hi all, >> >>I'm not on the list so please cc me any replies. >> >>I've noticed that friends cannot be protected or private anymore with >>g++-3.4 and g++-4.0. Is this the correct behaviour? Why? >> >> > >Yes, this is a correctness fix. I'm afraid I don't know enough about >C++ to explain why, but you can find a number of explanations in the >gcc list archives. > >
I found one http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg01760.html and a link from there to, http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#209 I don't understand the reasons for using access control in the friend statements except that it probably makes access control easier to write and apply in the compiler (ie. less exceptions) - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]