On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:16:28AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I begin to get the picture. > > Apparently the MIPS ABI is just plain broken. It contains some sort of > impassable hard limit on relocation table size, breaking random packages at > random times with no possible fix. Nobody can fix this without changing > the ABI. > > Lovely. Good grief, I would not want to support this architecture under > those circumstances, but as long as it doesn't interfere with supporting > other architectures, if you think you can do it, that's fine.
You don't get the picture. In fact the above is completely wrong. I recall explaining this to you yesterday. It's a lot of work to fix and no one has done it. That's not the same thing at all. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
