* Nathanael Nerode:

> In gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0, these functions have been replaced with out-of-line 
> functions, implemented in libstdc++.

Do these out-of-line functions avoid the LOCK prefix overhead on
non-SMP systems or, at least, non-threaded programs (for example,
using some dynamic linker magic)?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to