* Nathanael Nerode: > In gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0, these functions have been replaced with out-of-line > functions, implemented in libstdc++.
Do these out-of-line functions avoid the LOCK prefix overhead on non-SMP systems or, at least, non-threaded programs (for example, using some dynamic linker magic)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]