Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:36:58 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in or before gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 11:27:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 04:27:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from country.nixsys.be (grep.be) [195.144.77.46] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E10MK-0006U4-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 04:27:29 -0700
Received: from wouter by grep.be with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E10Lx-0002Pu-Ri
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:27:05 +0200
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:27:05 +0200
From: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PR 23080][m68k] ICE on building blacs-mpi
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Speed: Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
Organization: none
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-3
Tags: upstream

Hi,

GCC4 ICEs when trying to build blacs-mpi. Has been filed as upstream
PR23080 a while ago already (but apparently something went wrong with
the Debian bug I tried to file), and declared fixed there as well.

Rg,

-- 
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 320038-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2005 17:37:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 08 09:37:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.71] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EZXPk-0002op-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:37:44 -0800
Received: from ibm66aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113])
          by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:37:13 -0500
Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm66aec.bellsouth.net
          with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:37:13 -0500
Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2])
        by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A743E1771D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  8 Nov 2005 11:37:16 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1])
        by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A957D3594E
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  8 Nov 2005 11:37:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 16082-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:37:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id C0FA83594D; Tue,  8 Nov 2005 11:37:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id AC25C130485; Tue,  8 Nov 2005 11:36:58 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:36:58 -0600
From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in or before gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K8nIJk4ghYZn606h"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-3

I have confirmed that this bug is fixed in or before gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.

Thanks,

Stephen

--=20
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDcOI6VKM4J7YoSbMRAs6dAJ9EUo+9nLU9IW5drXOkCQ5cu/rwWwCeNKE5
99OV8eNNRaxtG9k5lj6M6bI=
=9U/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to