Your message dated Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2005 19:55:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 03 12:55:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBe6O-00062m-00; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 12:55:00 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
j83JsvsN031163
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 12:54:57 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id
j83JqWsb005564;
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 12:52:32 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j83JqWhq005562;
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 12:52:32 -0700
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 12:52:32 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-2.95: ftbfs [sparc] reorg.c:384: error: invalid lvalue in increment
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-22
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
gcc-2.95 fails to build in a current sparc sid pbuilder chroot. It
looks like it may be using gcc-4.0 to compile code that isn't clean
enough for gcc-4.0.
cc -c -DIN_GCC -DHAIFA -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc
-I/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/config
-I/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/../include
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c: In function
'find_end_label':
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c:384: error: invalid
lvalue in increment
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c: In function
'delete_from_delay_slot':
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c:583: error: invalid
lvalue in increment
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c: In function
'make_return_insns':
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c:3472: error: invalid
lvalue in increment
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c: In function
'dbr_schedule':
/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/reorg.c:3552: error: invalid
lvalue in increment
make[4]: *** [reorg.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/build-native/gcc'
make[3]: *** [boot_stage_a] Error 2
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326506-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 11:27:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 03 03:27:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx02.qsc.de ([213.148.130.14])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiVYX-0000wY-L3; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 03:27:53 -0800
Received: from port-195-158-169-121.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.169.121]
helo=hattusa.textio)
by mx02.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1EiVY2-0008PS-00; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 12:27:22 +0100
Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EiVY1-0002sq-K3; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
