------- Comment #3 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 22:33 ------- (gdb) call debug_generic_stmt (ret) startD.1278_2 + -3B > startD.1278_2 + 396B;
(gdb) call debug_generic_stmt (fold (ret)) 1 I guess the reasoning of fold is: it is pointer arithmetics, so it does not wrap. (-3B) = (0xfff...7) > 396B, so the result is always true. 4.0 does not have final value replacement, and 4.2 has different # of iterations analysis; but most likely some similar problem is latent in both versions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
