Erik Meusel wrote: > Am Montag, 12. Juni 2006 18:24 schrieb Bastian Blank: > > char is neither signed nor unsigned. Only unsigned have defined overflow > > behaviour. > > > > > } while (c != '\0'); > > > > > > return 0; > > > } > > Alright, but why does this work differently using different versions of gcc > or > different optimization levels?
For undefined behaviour, the compiler is free to change its mind as it likes. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
