Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-3
Severity: important

Package: xmorph
Version: 1:20050408b
Severity: important
Tags: patch

Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer
is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64.

[1]http://people.debian.org/~dannf/check-implicit-pointer-functions

----- Forwarded message from Debian/IA64 non-US Build Daemon <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> -----

Subject: Log for successful build of gcc-4.1_4.1.1-3 (dist=unstable)
From: Debian/IA64 non-US Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:17:58 +0100
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
X-PMX-Version: 5.1.2.240295, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 
2006.6.12.160432
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=XXXI, Probability=31%, Report='HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2 3.4, 
__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2_1 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 
0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_CRUFT 0'
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ldl.fc.hp.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on ldl.lart
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=3.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HG_HORMONE,
        LONGWORDS,UNDISC_RECIPS autolearn=no version=3.0.3
Debian-Buildd-Error: Yes

Function `get_set_constructor_bits' implicitly converted to pointer at 
../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378
Function `get_set_constructor_bits' implicitly converted to pointer at 
../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378
Function `get_set_constructor_bits' implicitly converted to pointer at 
../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378
Function `get_set_constructor_bits' implicitly converted to pointer at 
../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378
Function `get_set_constructor_bits' implicitly converted to pointer at 
../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378
Function `get_set_constructor_bits' implicitly converted to pointer at 
../../src/gcc/expr.c:5378

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to