------- Comment #20 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-15 07:37 -------
Looking at i386 backend, also (const (plus (unspec (something)) (const_int)))
is special (a whole bunch of routines rely on the unspec being surrounded
by CONST, optionally with a PLUS in there).
Not sure if make_tree should try to fallback whenever it sees this too
(safer option), or if it e.g. can return dummy VAR_DECL
with (const (unspec (something))) plus the constant.
An, other backends need auditing what exactly they do with CONST.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29825

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to