------- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 22:36 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Manuel: thanks for volunteering to write a patch. > > I've just spoken with Joseph Myers (a friend of mine who does gcc development > work), and his opinion was that this issue isn't a sufficiently major one for > it to be worth trying to make a case on the mailing list beforehand. His > recommendation was to submit a patch first. So I think you should feel free to > write the patch. (Or I might do it if I find some free time, but that doesn't > seem very likely at this point.) >
OK, I will prepare a patch for 1) and 2) when I have some free time. We can deal with 3) later, once the first patch is approved. As far as I know, 4) is the current policy and 5) may not be feasible, since no new features are accepted in old branches. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28322 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
