Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso writes: > I'm well aware of Debian's stance on GFDL docs (though I have a hard > time agreeing with it myself), but an important package like not > containing a manpage at all is a policy violation, and having the > manpage along with the rest of the documentation in the non-free > section is unacceptable, as Debian does not consider the non-free > section to be part of Debian. > > I expect the GFDL fiasco to get resolved once Eben Moglen writes a new > draft of the GFDL, but in the meantime, gcc needs at the very least a > stub manpage in order to conform with policy. I attach such a stub > with the hopes that it can be added to gcc.
I disagree, the man page basically is a place holder, adding a conflict to the gcc-4.1-doc package. gcc(1) is not the only man page not built anymore from the gcc-4.1 source, and many man pages from other packages are not built anymore. A paragraph in the release notes would be more appropriate. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
