On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:16:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:06:38PM -0500, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> > > So what, exactly, is the status of the GFDL and GCC's manpage? I still
> > > insist that no GCC manpage is a serious policy violation, especially
> > > considering the importance of a package like GCC.
> >
> > The man page is generated from the Texinfo documentation. Accordingly
> > it is covered by the same license. I don't know what the status of
> > invariant sections in it is.
>
> same as for the texinfo docs.
Can't be:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the
GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later
version published by the Free Soft-
ware Foundation; with the Invariant Sections being "GNU General
Public License" and "Funding
Free Software", the Front-Cover texts being (a) (see below),
and with the Back-Cover Texts
being (b) (see below). A copy of the license is included in
the gfdl(7) man page.
but they aren't in the man page at all.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
