On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:22:02AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 06:01:03PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Matthias Klose a écrit : > > > Peter Green writes: > > >> package:gcc-4.1 > > >> version:4.1.2-7 > > >> severity:serious > > >> > > >> from the relavent buildd logs: > > > > > > Note, that the severity is not RC for 68k; I do not intend to fix > > > that. Same for arm, and arm porters don't seem to care that much, so > > > maybe we should drop arm as a release architecture? > > > > > > > > You can find a preliminary patch here: > > > > http://temp.aurel32.net/libffi-arm-closure.diff > > > > With it gcc-4.1 builds well, I am restarting a full build with the testsuite > > > > The patch is correct, at least the testsuite shows the exact same > results, though not very good. > > Please find attached a patch against the current debian package. >
I have just given a quick look to gcc-4.2. As it does not uses libjava-backport-updates2.dpatch, the problem is probably not present in this version. Also I can't find any occurence of ffi_prep_closure_loc in the sources. Cheers, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]