On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > > miss another backport from the trunk.
> > >
> > > Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
> > > strict dependencies on the binary-indep packages; reported as #385793,
> > > "solved" by the xulrunner maintainers. Please build the package
> > > manually first, or make the libxul-dev package installable even if the
> > > release number of the indep and arch packages mismatch. I still don't
> > > understand what the xulrunner maintainers want to prove with the strict
> > > dependency, but that's definitely something which delays things, even
> > > for the faster architectures.
> >
> > What part of
> > Depends: libxul0d (>= 1.8.1.4), libxul0d (<< 1.8.1.4-2.1~), libnss3-dev,
> > libnspr4-dev, libmozjs-dev (= 1.8.1.4-2), xulrunner
> >
> > makes libxul-dev uninstallable when indep and arch packages mismatch ?
> > (libmozjs-dev being arch: all)
>
> please check the build logs at
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot
All I see is:
gcj-4.1: Depends: libgcj7-dev (= 4.1.2-12) but it is not going to be installed
libgtk2.0-dev: Depends: libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.10.12-2) but it is not going to be
installed
libxul-dev: Depends: libxul0d (>= 1.8.1.4) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxul0d (< 1.8.1.4-2.1~) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: xulrunner but it is not going to be installed
And I still fail to see how libxul-dev dependencies are responsible of
any trouble. See
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=libxul0d
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
