Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software


Hello,

I think I found a bug in gcc-4.2. The bug is easy to reproduce. I have
it under sid and also under testing.

I provide a simple test program (gint_to_pointer.c):
#include <stdio.h>

int main(void)
{
   int i, j;

   for (i=0; i<6; i++)
   {
           j = i-1;
           printf("%d %d\n", j, (void *)(j));
   }
}


When compiled with make gint_to_pointer CFLAGS="-O0" the execution gives:
-1 -1
0 0
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4


But when compiled with make gint_to_pointer CFLAGS="-O2" the execution gives:
-1 -1
0 -1
1 -1
2 -1
3 -1
4 -1

I generated the assembly for the two cases.
With -O0
        .file   "gint_to_pointer.c"
        .section        .rodata
.LC0:
        .string "%d %d\n"
        .text
.globl main
        .type   main, @function
main:
        leal    4(%esp), %ecx
        andl    $-16, %esp
        pushl   -4(%ecx)
        pushl   %ebp
        movl    %esp, %ebp
        pushl   %ecx
        subl    $36, %esp
        movl    $0, -12(%ebp)
        jmp     .L2
.L3:
        movl    -12(%ebp), %eax
        subl    $1, %eax
        movl    %eax, -8(%ebp)
        movl    -8(%ebp), %eax
        movl    %eax, 8(%esp)
        movl    -8(%ebp), %eax
        movl    %eax, 4(%esp)
        movl    $.LC0, (%esp)
        call    printf
        addl    $1, -12(%ebp)
.L2:
        cmpl    $5, -12(%ebp)
        jle     .L3
        addl    $36, %esp
        popl    %ecx
        popl    %ebp
        leal    -4(%ecx), %esp
        ret
        .size   main, .-main
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-5)"
        .section        .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits



with -O2:
        .file   "gint_to_pointer.c"
        .section        .rodata.str1.1,"aMS",@progbits,1
.LC0:
        .string "%d %d\n"
        .text
        .p2align 4,,15
.globl main
        .type   main, @function
main:
        leal    4(%esp), %ecx
        andl    $-16, %esp
        pushl   -4(%ecx)
        pushl   %ebp
        movl    %esp, %ebp
        pushl   %ebx
        xorl    %ebx, %ebx
        pushl   %ecx
        subl    $16, %esp
        movl    $-1, 8(%esp)
        movl    $-1, 4(%esp)
        movl    $.LC0, (%esp)
        call    printf
        .p2align 4,,7
.L2:
        movl    %ebx, 4(%esp)
        addl    $1, %ebx
        movl    $-1, 8(%esp)
        movl    $.LC0, (%esp)
        call    printf
        cmpl    $5, %ebx
        jne     .L2
        addl    $16, %esp
        popl    %ecx
        popl    %ebx
        popl    %ebp
        leal    -4(%ecx), %esp
        ret
        .size   main, .-main
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-5)"
        .section        .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits


I do not read i386 assembly so can't help spot the bug.

Notes:
I have no problem if I use "i" or "i+1" instead of "i-1".
I have no problem if I start the loop at 1 instead of 0.


I discovered the bug because of my package does not work correctly anymore.
Other packages compiled with gcc-4.2 may also fail in very obscure ways.

Thanks,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages gcc-4.2 depends on:
ii  binutils                      2.18-1     The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.2                       4.2.1-5    The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.2-base                  4.2.1-5    The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6                         2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.2.1-5  GCC support library
ii  libgomp1                      4.2.1-5    GCC OpenMP (GOMP) support library

Versions of packages gcc-4.2 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev                     2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn  libmudflap0-4.2-dev           <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to