Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: > > > Currently, gcc-4.2-doc *is* in main. Does this mean that FDL paranoia > > > has gone to past, or gcc-4.2-doc is in main just in error - I don't > > > know. But depending on this, either non-free and contrib packages > > > should be updated, or gcc-doc should be provided by gcc-defaults (as > > > it was some time ago). > > > > > > Matthias, could you please comment on this? > > > > please see my comment in #442445 > > from #442445: > > won't fix this before the 4.2.3 and 4.3.0 releases > > Not very verbose :) > > Could you please answer what is going to be changed at the time of > 4.2.3/4.3.0?
the man pages and -doc packages won't be built anymore with the final 4.2.3/4.3.0 releases. > Will you handle documentation issues yourself? I won't touch the non-free -doc packages. > Or my non-free/contrib packages are will be needed again? most likely. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]