On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:41:59PM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 04:54:29PM +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:15:11AM +0000, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
> > > > lenny+1 to revert this ?
> > > 
> > >   I second that, please don't revert the patch until lenny+1. FWIW I
> > > believe the release team as a whole wanted the patch to be kept as well,
> > > but I'll let the other members correct me if I'm wrong.
> > 
> > that's fine with me, as long as
> > 
> >  - the release team commits to maintain this patch
> >  - the release team commits to check every bug report filed against
> >    gcc with an upstream build and report back to the Debian BTS
> >  - the release team shows that it is able to do so, and has done so
> >    in the past.
> 
>   This will last up to the lenny release, and the toolchain is to be
> freezed next week. So I don't ...
  ... think you'll have to support that patch actively for too long.


-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpcFAaXrR7z1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to