------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 22:55 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > There are > > i386/i386.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_AVX ? 256: 128) > m68k/m68k.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ALIGN_INT ? 32 : 16) > mcore/mcore.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_8ALIGN ? 64 : 32) > sh/sh.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ALIGN_DOUBLE ? 64 : 32) > sparc/sparc.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ARCH64 ? 128 : 64) >
Yes but if you look at the options that the other targets uses for BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT are ABI changing options and not just processor changing options. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
