------- Comment #16 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-22 18:33 ------- So what is required to close this issue?
* Original submitter is incorrect, there has never been a __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 symbol, and there should not be one now? * glibc on hppa-linux-gnu has never had a __signbitl symbol. * I have changed the glibc hppa-linux-gnu port to define __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH, and therefore the signbit macro, even in the abscense of optimization, will always return a valid signbit function based on the type size. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
