------- Comment #4 from tydeman at tybor dot com 2009-10-31 17:42 -------
The requirement that translation time precision be at least as great as runtime
precision existed in C89, C90, C95, and C99 (so has been around for 20 years).
My code is a test of translation time precision versus runtime precision.
The first code I saw in bug 323 involved 3 auto variables (so is just runtime).
That is a different issue, so I believe that this bug is not a duplicate of
323.
I used gnu99 instead of c99 for the std because I also am testing Decimal FP
in addition to Binary FP. Where should I find documentation on compiler
options to get as close to C99 conformance as possible? Also, C99 + Decimal
FP conformance?
The output you show is what I expected.
--
tydeman at tybor dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41867
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
