On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 06:57:09PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > if this is a compiler issue, i can't really do anything about it. if > you're feeling proactive, you can bisect their commits, and issolate > the patch that caused the regression? anyway, the best course of
I fetched a copy from git.infradead.org, but building 4.4.0 died of a C++ error after 45 minutes, so that sorta killed my enthousiasm right there. Not to mention that I could not figure out how to tell gcc to stop building itself with itself, thus rendering my ccache useless (--disable-bootstrap did not do the trick). Re-building gcc from scratch on an old Athlon is not fun. :( I'm CCing the Debian GCC team, in case they have a suggestion to make bisecting easier. (Or better yet, if they can reproduce the bug themselves.) -- In seeking the unattainable, simplicity only gets in the way. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100503153100.ga31...@toroia.fbriere.dyndns.org