On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> That indeed it is, and I've been aware of it for a while. > I actually fixed this with the patch in bug 581240 - hitting two birds with > one stone. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581240#20 > If you have a look, the update addresses two things. > 1) Create a cgraph node only if a function requires a static chain - we > don't care if the tree code isn't FUNCTION_DECL. > 2) Omit frame pointers in naked functions (bug #581240). > > I see you raised another bug in libphobos, I'll have a look at that first > before letting Matthias know to update gdc in sid. > Regards > -- > Iain Buclaw > > *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0'; > I've tried your patch (compiling gdc took 67minutes on my laptop ._.) and it does indeed fix both bugs for me. Great work :-) On a side note: It seems like the gdc meta-package in squeeze was updated recently now depends on gdc-4.3 instead of gdc-4.1 - is gdc 4.3 really stable enough to be the default gdc? I just played around with D for a few days and discovered two bugs, so it seems to me that gdc-4.3 is far from being as mature as gdc-4.1 .. Cheers, - Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinxuewndxwe_hvkla3dyyyxq8wtqt6vcrypy...@mail.gmail.com
