On 21 November 2010 02:45, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >> We have dpkg-buildflags available but few packages are using it and it's >> unlikely they will be all converted in the wheezy timeframe. > > I agree with the precise meaning of this statement, but the spirit seems > quite wrong. For the packages I am involved in (not many), I have > deliberately not used dpkg-buildflags to make backporting easier. > It is a new facility but a very good one, and I suspect that it will > be adopted fairly quickly, especially if someone writes the appropriate > patches to debian/rules (or even better, writes a program maintainers > can use to automate this). > > Also, I am not the GCC maintainer, but from experience of receiving > reports from people building software with Ubuntu, I think changing > the defaults in GCC is quite wrong.
Why do you think this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=9p9sz2rkybmvkquo7nfnue=npiexcekgrj...@mail.gmail.com
