On 26.02.2011 18:08, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:49:49PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 26.02.2011 04:42, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 25.02.2011 08:46, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Clearly one should be mindful of the effect on GCC -- that's why I
asked the question on debian-gcc. Do you have any specific concerns?
Have any concerns been raised on the GCC mailing list? I've googled
and found only anecdotal positive reports:
http://www.listware.net/201003/gcc-gcc/99756-gmp-501-and-gcc-45.html
Is there a GCC autobuilder suite that can do all these rebuilds? I
will upload there.
I don't have such a setup.
OK, but someone must have a similar setup. People are occasionally
rebuilding the archive to test new GCC versions. Anyone on the
debian-gcc list got an idea?
does gcc still work when gmp5 is in the archive, and mpfr is not yet
rebuilt against the new gmp5?
Sure: I've been running that way at home for a year. Why wouldn't it
work?
I didn't ask about your *home*, but the *archive* (and the buildds).
Instead of asking cryptic questions, could you please spell out your
concerns in detail so that we could address them.
what is cryptic about the question?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d69341e.4060...@debian.org
