On 08/02/2011 12:25 PM, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> Maybe it would be nice to apply kbsd-gnu.diff unconditionally, instead >> of only on kfreebsd-*, so that such breakage becomes visible more >> immediately? > > Sorry for the noise, I was working off of 4.6.1-5 and noticed only after > sending this mail that Aurelien had already corrected this in r5453. > Still, applying kbsd-gnu.diff unconditionally would be a good idea IMHO. > I'll refrain from making the change myself; I'll leave the decision to > Aurelien and Matthias.
>From my point of view patches should be applied unconditionally, at least >during normal development. I would like to see patches applied conditionally which are not yet upstream, or which are only applied for some specific port issue for a port on debian-ports. When in doubt apply it conditionally. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e390dda.7090...@debian.org