On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:47:00PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:39:58AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 08:43:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> > > >> wrote: > > >> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:45:35PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > >> >> Hi gcc and powerpc teams, > > >> >> > > >> >> Supercollider recently failed to build in powerpc[1] with some weird > > >> >> errors about operand out of range. Googling around suggests working > > >> >> around the problem by avoiding inlining. And in fact, SC builds after > > >> >> avoiding inlining one function. However, it seems to me this is a bug > > >> >> in gcc, since it shouldn't ouptut invalid assembler. I'm not quite > > >> >> sure how to handle this sort of bug, however. Where should I file this > > >> >> bug (that is, which package)? This bug seems to have happened a few > > >> >> times already, so I'm not quite sure if this is supposed to be fixed > > >> >> or not. > > >> > > > >> > Just as a data point, I've reproduced this identically on current > > >> > unstable (powerpc). Have you tried using a different compiler > > >> > version e.g. 4.7? I can do further investigation tomorrow if you > > >> > would like. > > >> > > >> I am testing on partch, I don't have access to other ppc hardware. > > >> Partch has gcc 4.4 and 4.6, it fails with both, with the same error > > >> but in different places (4.4 has lots of errors, 4.6 just 2). > > > > > > I can give you access to a G4 ppc running current testing with > > > build chroots available on it if you would find that useful.e The > > > only thing is that you'll need IPv6 to access it. > > > > I don't think it'd be useful. I definitely do not have the expertise > > to debug gcc. > > I'll try doing a binary-only NMU build with sbuild (รก la the buildds), > and if that also succeeds, I'll upload it. If I can reproduce the > failure, I'll see if I can dump the preprocessed source and make a > testcase; but given the elusive nature of the bug this might not be > possible.
Hmm, I see 1:3.5.3~repack-3 has built successfully over two days ago. Did you find out what the problem was here? Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731225648.gn25...@codelibre.net