On 21.08.2012 06:51, Daniel Schepler wrote: > OK, I've gotten it working now. The issue was that I hadn't added x32 > to biarch64 or biarch32, so biarch_multidir_names was never being set. > (I also added x32 to the multilib dirs that get filtered in > ml-config.diff, since that's what pointed me to the problem.) > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: >> On 17.08.2012 18:12, Daniel Schepler wrote: >>> On a side note, instead of adding libx32gcc1 etc., >> >> I don't like the idea of having to cros-build-depend on other architectures, >> so >> as a first step, I'd like to see these packages built. > > Neither do I -- but I also don't like the idea of [e]glibc having to > keep cross-building libraries purely for the use of gcc builds.
No. the multilib configurations are used for more than that. No, not for package builds. > And IMO all other Debian package uses of gcc-multilib and libc6-dev-* > should go away during the next release cycle in favor of multiarch (at > least I can't think of anything else where it's justified). No. They should stay, to build a multilib'ed compiler. And I won't apply any local patch to the gcc package to lookup header and o files in other places, so if you want to improve the situation, work with upstream to get this into the next GCC release. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50336770.8040...@debian.org