On 14/12/12 14:10, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 12.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Roland Stigge: >> regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the >> unstable and experimental versions of gcc-4.7, respectively. >> >> As written before, in Debian, t-spe wasn't included properly (only on >> some bsd variant). So doing it instead of t-linux in the powerpcspe >> case, when spe is present. > > is this wanted, e.g. defining all the MULTILIB macros?
No, not necessary. > then better add the t-spe bits to the t-linux file. Fine with that. That's actually what my very first patch did that I submitted with this report. So please take it. :-) (t-spe contains only multilib stuff that we don't need anyway for powerpcspe.) Thanks, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50cb2ad5.40...@antcom.de
