On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 at 20:05:52 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > source include license-problem-gfdl-invariants in doc/autoconf.info (aka > invariant section and back cover) > It is not a source is missing problem. It a not modifiable problem
The winning option of https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 says: ... works that don't include any Invariant Sections, Cover Texts, Acknowledgements, and Dedications (or that do, but permission to remove them is explicitly granted), are suitable for the main component of our distribution. However, autoconf.texi in autoconf2.64 does have Cover Texts: with the Front-Cover texts being ``A @acronym{GNU} Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``@acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License.'' (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and modify this @acronym{GNU} manual. Buying copies from the @acronym{FSF} supports it in developing @acronym{GNU} and promoting software freedom.'' Since autoconf2.64 is only in the archive for the benefit of gcc and a couple of others (kyototycoon, gnat-4.9), maybe the best approach would be a +dfsg1 tarball that deletes the documentation? The latest documentation (in src:autoconf) doesn't have these cover texts. Regards, S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141107101508.ga7...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk
