On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 02:12:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > there is no package inside the distribution where this would break anything. > For > the bootstrap you certainly can work around this by ignoring the conflicts. > This
Since rebootstrap does not do native builds, it is non-trivial to work around these. > may be inconvenient, but I don't think this should be the reason for another > RC There also is no pressing need to make this inconvenient at all. You should work out the underlying disagreement with the relevant maintainers instead of causing collateral damage to third parties. There is no need to make users suffer from procedural disagreements. > issue. How to build the cross compilers matching the native compilers is > discussed in other places, and from my point of view it was agreed not to just > continue the builds as done with 4.9. It is unfortunate that packages for 5 > are > uploaded without giving any notice and without addressing these things first. I suggest that you put your disagreement with the methodology into rc bugs against the packages that did not arrive in the archive yet. As far as I can tell this has worked well for the 4.9 series as indeed none of them migrated. The current conflicts block the supported cross build method from being useful. Please stop the madness. Play your war in a different field. Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150501122501.ga26...@alf.mars
