On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 00:35 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> this is unfortunate, however there never was and is any commitment of
> unstable
> getting security fixes.
Sure, however reality is probably, that many people actually run
unstable as their stable systems - I woudln't be surprised if this is
also done by many DDs and if all of them are right now exposed to quite
a number of critical security issues (e.g. the recent Firefox hole) we
have a real problem, commitment or not :-(


> The issue is not fixed by any upload of boost1.55 built
> with GCC 4.9, and it won't build with GCC 5.  An update to 1.57 or 
> 1.58 is
> required.
And it can't be fixed to build with v5? :-(


Thanks,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to