Control: tags -1 - patch Control: tags -1 + wontfix closing. This is not the recent upstream patch, and it's still not applied upstream. Please update the patch for gcc-8 and gcc-7 and resubmit it once it's applied upstream.
On 12.09.2017 21:36, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 07.09.2017 17:07, Wookey wrote: >> Package: gcc-6 >> Version: 6.3.0-18 >> Severity: normal >> Tags: upstream patch >> >> gcc has arm64 ILP32 support, but it only works if built as a multilib >> on arm64 architecture. This patch allows gcc to also be configured >> for the aarch64 ILP32 triplet and build the right thing. Without it, >> gcc defaults to LP64 even when the build is configured as >> TARGET=aarch64-linux-gnu_ilp32 which is wrong. >> >> Note that this uses the newer triplet for this ABI agreed at Linaro >> Connect (Feb 2018): aarch64-linux-gnu_ilp32, matching the change made >> in binutils. >> >> This support is in gcc-ilp32-default-support.patch >> >> The existing debian multiarch support patch has to be modified to >> match the right triplet and multiarch/multilib paths too. A patch for that >> is attached in >> gcc-fixup-multilib-patch-for-ilp32-default.patch >> >> That is a rather confusing patch-patch, so here is the final file that >> should result from it (sans header): >> >> LIB1ASMSRC = aarch64/lib1funcs.asm >> LIB1ASMFUNCS = _aarch64_sync_cache_range >> >> AARCH_BE = $(if $(findstring TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN_DEFAULT=1, $(tm_defines)),_be) >> ifneq (,$(findstring _ilp32,$(target))) >> MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES = mabi.lp64=../lib64$(call >> if_multiarch,:aarch64$(AARCH_BE)-linux-gnu) >> MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES += mabi.ilp32=../lib$(call >> if_multiarch,:aarch64$(AARCH_BE)-linux-gnu_ilp32) >> MULTIARCH_DIRNAME = $(call if_multiarch,aarch64$(AARCH_BE)-linux-gnu_ilp32) >> else >> MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES = mabi.lp64=../lib$(call >> if_multiarch,:aarch64$(AARCH_BE)-linux-gnu) >> MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES += mabi.ilp32=../libilp32$(call >> if_multiarch,:aarch64$(AARCH_BE)-linux-gnu_ilp32) >> MULTIARCH_DIRNAME = $(call if_multiarch,aarch64$(AARCH_BE)-linux-gnu) >> endif >> >> These have only been tested on gcc-6, although they should work the same >> on gcc-7. I will supply separate bug/patches for gcc-7. > > please do. also are all of these accepted upstream? >