Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:07:33 +0100 with message-id <74404b38-7b56-84bd-3a4d-2dfb1ca8a...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#950550: libgcc1: upgrade from 1:9.2.1-25 to libgcc1 1:10-20200202-1 breaks gcc has caused the Debian Bug report #950550, regarding libgcc1: upgrade from 1:9.2.1-25 to libgcc1 1:10-20200202-1 breaks gcc to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 950550: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950550 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: libgcc1 Version: 1:10-20200202-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? apt update && apt upgrade -y * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? before upgrade libgcc1: ii libgcc1:sparc64 1:9.2.1-25 sparc64 GCC support library after upgrade: ii libgcc1 1:10-20200202-1 sparc64 GCC support library (dependency package) * What was the outcome of this action? $ cat hello_world.c #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf("%s \n", "hello world!"); } $ gcc hello_world.c /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status * What outcome did you expect instead? able to compile c source codes files. Downgrading package back to version 9.2.1-25 helps Going to post (gcc -v) and/or (ldconfig -v) on a request. PS: Probably related to #946285 -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unreleased'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: sparc64 Kernel: Linux 5.5.0-08726-g46d6b7becb1d (SMP w/32 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages libgcc1 depends on: ii gcc-10-base 10-20200202-1 ii libc6 2.29-1 ii libgcc-s1 10-20200202-1 libgcc1 recommends no packages. libgcc1 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 10-20200204-1 On 2/5/20 9:55 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> * Add breaks on libgcc-N-dev packages on arm64, s390x and sparc64. >> Closes: #950550, #950579. > > This is not enough. All architectures are affected when using gold. this bug doesn't have anything to do with gold. Closing again. If you want to be pedantic, feel free to open another issue. otoh, I don't see this as RC, as you can use the default linker.
--- End Message ---
