Hi, On 10/12/23 15:17, Matthias Klose wrote:
I cannot reproduce this, and I would rather not investigate time into that. Please check if you see this with gcc-13 as well.
I suspect it's a missing dependency, so the failure is more dependent on "number of threads", and that it succeeds for -b might be coincidence.
I'll try adding a sleep statement to the rule generating this file and see if I can get it to reproduce always.
Simon
