Your message dated Tue, 20 Jan 2026 07:28:34 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1125993: libgphobos-dev is missing for ppc64le
architecture
has caused the Debian Bug report #1125993,
regarding libgphobos-dev is missing for ppc64le architecture
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1125993: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1125993
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgphobos-dev
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.3
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: ppc64el (ppc64le)
Kernel: Linux 6.14.0-37-generic (SMP w/24 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 15.2.0-5
did you even check before filing an (incomplete) report?
On 1/20/26 07:18, laserovsky wrote:
Package: libgphobos-dev
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.3
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
'stable')
Architecture: ppc64el (ppc64le)
Kernel: Linux 6.14.0-37-generic (SMP w/24 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect
--- End Message ---
