Hello, as this thread starts getting a little bit confusing I will reply to my original post again.
I'm still unable to get the lintian pbuilder hook up and running, but I don't really care because I can just call lintian manually. So here is the current state of the lintian report: P: sfcgal source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature P: libsfcgal-dev: no-upstream-changelog X: libsfcgal-dev: duplicate-files usr/share/doc/libsfcgal-dev/examples/CGAL-basic_manip/CMakeLists.txt usr/share/doc/libsfcgal-dev/examples/CGAL-cartesian_kernel/CMakeLists.txt usr/share/doc/libsfcgal-dev/examples/CGAL-point_generator/CMakeLists.txt usr/share/doc/libsfcgal-dev/examples/CGAL-polygon_triangulation2/CMakeLists.txt usr/share/doc/libsfcgal-dev/examples/CGAL-triangulation2/CMakeLists.txt usr/share/doc/libsfcgal-dev/examples/SFCGAL-offset/CMakeLists.txt X: libsfcgal-dev: duplicate-files usr/share/doc/libsfcgal-dev/examples/SFCGAL-asc2osg/CMakeLists.txt usr/share/doc/libsfcgal-dev/examples/SFCGAL-export-osg/CMakeLists.txt I: libsfcgal1: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSFCGAL.so.1.1.0 inconsistant inconsistent I: libsfcgal1: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSFCGAL.so.1.1.0 P: libsfcgal1: no-upstream-changelog I: sfcgal-bin: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/viewer-SFCGAL informations information P: sfcgal-bin: no-upstream-changelog Out of those I only consider hardening-no-fortify-functions and the spelling stuff a showstopper. "P:" means pedantic anyway and "X:" ist just plain stupid as it is does perfectly make sense to name CMakeLists.txt the same all over the place. I don't know why I still have the hardening-no-fortify-functions problem, as I added all the stuff from https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#Using_Hardening_Options to debian/rulse file and "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" is handed to the c++ compiler during compilation as expected. Concerning the spelling errors my upstream patch has been accepted unfortunately without adding a new tag. So what's the best way to include this upstream diff? Ah and something else: I disabled the tests again as they are testing the in-system library instead of the just compiled one. Regards Sven -- "Der wichtigste Aspekt, den Sie vor der Entscheidung für ein Open Source-Betriebssystem bedenken sollten, ist, dass Sie kein Windows-Betriebssystem erhalten." (von http://www.dell.de/ubuntu) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gis-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/mlmfnt$4t0$1...@solar.geggus.net
