Your message dated Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:10:05 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#95332: Already documented
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2001 14:02:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 26 09:02:19 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zukerman-0.dsl.speakeasy.net (matt.w80.math-hat.com) [216.254.75.141]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14smLb-0005rs-00; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:02:19 -0500
Received: from zukerman by matt.w80.math-hat.com with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14smLZ-0005sm-00; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:02:17 -0400
From: Itai Zukerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: error() undocumented
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:02:17 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: wishlist
The error* functions from
/usr/include/error.h
seem to be undocumented. Are they standard?
-itai
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 95332-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2002 09:10:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 31 03:10:08 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18TIPX-00053Y-00; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 03:10:08 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id F0D9BC351C; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:10:05 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:10:05 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#95332: Already documented
In-Reply-To: <20021230134221.GA29583@crystal>
References: <20021230134221.GA29583@crystal>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 08:42:21 -0500,
H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, /usr/include/error.h is now documented in the info pages, under the
> "Error Messages" node. This is on glibc-doc 2.3.1-8. And according to
> the info page, these functions are GNU extensions.
That's right.
> So I propose this bug should be closed, or re-assigned to manpages-dev if
> the bug submitter deems it necessary to update the manpages to document
> these functions. (These functions are not documented in manpages-dev
> 1.48-2 and earlier.)
I recommend that bug report resubmit to BTS if the bug submitter wants
such manpages. I close this bug.
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
