Your message dated 06 Feb 2003 09:52:22 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#179974: Evidently my mistake. Close this.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2003 01:21:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 05 19:21:54 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pm4-d45.nas.com (debian1.loaner.com) [198.182.208.227]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18gaji-0005I8-00; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 19:21:54 -0600
Received: by debian1.loaner.com
id m18gai8-005GyeC
(Debian Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2); Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:20:16 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6: Broke audio
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-10
Severity: normal
Thanks for maintaining libc6.
I use it every day.
I noticed that after upgrading to version 2.3.1-10 of libc6,
four audio applications were silenced (audacity, sox,
festival and xwave).
Was libc6 recompiled with a new version of gcc that makes it
less compatible?
Thanks,
Kingsley
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux debian1.loaner.com 2.4.19-aa1 #1 Sat Nov 2 20:42:05 PST 2002
i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-4 The Berkeley database routines [glibc 2.0/2.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 179974-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2003 09:52:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 06 03:52:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18giht-0000ka-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 03:52:34 -0600
Received: from kc.cam.armlinux.org ([81.96.69.239])
by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:52:32 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by kc.cam.armlinux.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18gihi-0003DL-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 09:52:22 +0000
Subject: Re: Bug#179974: Evidently my mistake. Close this.
From: Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kingsley G. Morse Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization:
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1
Date: 06 Feb 2003 09:52:22 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 02:02, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
> Playing around with a different mixer fixed my
> problem.
>
> Evidently this wasn't a bug in libc6.
>
> I suggest closing this bug report.
Okay, great. Thanks for letting us know.
I'm closing this report.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
