On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 07:27:36PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:45, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I wonder it's really safe. If we create a lot of threads like Java > > EJB environment, we consume virtual memory four times faster than the > > current implementation. You find STACK_SIZE is a boundary for each > > thread. The right way is to support floating stack (thus libc6-686) > > or nptl + tls, I think. I'm afraid this patch affects badly. > > Ah. Does Java really create that many threads? > > If it does, then you're right: we will have to back out this patch, and > applications that need abnormally large thread stacks must allocate them > by hand.
Or get back to having an i686 libc... this is one of the major advantages. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
