Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241393: SPARC64 binaries work fine.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2004 04:57:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 20:57:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from victor.harbourmsp.com [210.87.32.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8uGW-0005Hz-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:57:20 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by victor.harbourmsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9B356DDDBB; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST)
Received: from victor.harbourmsp.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (victor [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 31930-09; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST)
Received: from freemantle.harbour (freemantle.harbour [172.16.40.28])
by victor.harbourmsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 609BBDDD2A; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1000 (EST)
Received: by freemantle.harbour (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id BD6591F0009; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:56:46 +1000 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: sparc64 binaries do not execute
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:56:46 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at harbourmsp.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried compiling a kernel at first, but it told me it could not execute
a file.
./check_asm >> asm_offsets.h
/bin/sh: line 1: ./check_asm: cannot execute binary file
Then I tried compiling my own version of hello world and got this:
$ ./hello
-bash: ./hello: cannot execute binary file
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /root/hello
/usr/bin/ldd: line 1: /lib64/ld-linux.so.2: cannot execute binary file
not a dynamic executable
Then I tried to ldd ldd
$ /usr/bin/ldd /usr/bin/ldd
/usr/bin/ldd: line 1: /lib64/ld-linux.so.2: cannot execute binary file
not a dynamic executable
There is something *seriously* wrong going on here.
- Craig
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 241393-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 00:18:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 17:18:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGRvB-00052r-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:18:29 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 783EADEB7C; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: James Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small)
Subject: Re: Bug#241393: SPARC64 binaries work fine.
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
At 19 Apr 2004 12:04:06 -0400,
James Morrison wrote:
> BenC suggested the binfmt_elf module is needed to run 64 bit binaries.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/debian-sparc-200404/msg00145.html
Yeah, thanks.
Though I didn't hear about this progress, I've closed this bug because
it's tagged as RC bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
