Hi, I'm forwarding this to debian-amd64 since I'm not working on debians amd64 anymore since the DAM rejected me.
Can anyone still reproduce the df bug below? MfG Goswin GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 10 Dec 2003 09:38:42 +0100, > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> I still see this bug on my system here: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% df >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on >> df: `/': Invalid argument >> df: `/proc': Invalid argument >> df: `/boot': Invalid argument >> df: `/dev/pts': Invalid argument >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% uname -a >> Linux opteron 2.6.0-test11 #1 SMP Mon Dec 8 11:31:17 CET 2003 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% cat /proc/version >> Linux version 2.6.0-test11 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian >> prerelease)) #1 SMP Mon Dec 8 11:31:17 CET 2003 >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l coreutils libc6 >> ii coreutils 5.0.91-2 The GNU core utilities >> ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone >> >> Looking at fs/compat.c in 2.6.0-test11 I see the patch present in the >> bugreport was included. All it seems to do is change "Bad address" to >> "Invalid argument". >> >> >> Older glibc, like the 2.3.2-7.biarch1 version used for debian-amd64 >> sarge, work fine though: > ... >> PPS: I will compile a 2.4.23 kernel and do the same tests next time I >> reboot just for good measure. > > Is this bug still alive, Goswin? > > Regards, > -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]